Produced for @empowervmedia Edited & fact-checked by @jorgebscomm Emotions such as fear and outrage make us more susceptible to false news. (📷:universityofcambridge) B efore diving into psychology, we must define our terms . Misinformation is misleading or false information that is spread, regardless of intent . It covers everything from honest mistakes to urban legends. In contrast, disinformation is a form of misinformation that is created and shared on purpose to mislead or manipulate people . In practice, experts often consider disinformation as a subset of misinformation, because it can be hard to know the originator’s intent . For example, a viral hoax about a miracle cure might be pure misinformation (someone misunderstood a fact), while an organised campaign spreading false health scares to sow panic would be disinformation. In either case, the core problem is that the information is false and can have harmful effects on people and society . ...
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Beyond “It Didn’t Age Well”: Media Literacy, Virtue Mirroring, and Judging Older Media
Deeper media analysis can foster a more nuanced understanding of both past and present content.(📷:mylifesnotes)
In today’s online conversations, especially on social media, it is common to read that a beloved movie or show “didn’t age well”. This phrase often marks the end of debate rather than inviting closer analysis. For example, a magazine notes that older Hollywood classics are full of “blatant examples of racism, misogyny and homophobia”. Viewers then use this as a catch-all reason to dismiss these works outright. But simply declaring content outdated or offensive undercuts any chance to understand why those stereotypes or attitudes appeared. It prevents us from asking questions about the story’s intentions, the creator’s context, or the norms of the time. In effect, saying “it hasn’t aged well” can be a way of avoiding the hard work of examining media critically.
'This didn't age well... (The Osbournes)' ▶️2m06s
This problem is exacerbated by our current fragmented media landscape. Unlike earlier decades when most people shared the same TV shows and films, today audiences are divided among countless streaming services and social platforms. This means fewer shared cultural reference points. A viewer might encounter an old film outside its original era and simply judge it by today’s standards without recognising its era’s perspective. When every viewer watches media on their own terms, it becomes easy to project contemporary values onto past content. The result is that older works are often reduced to a single moral verdict: good or bad, outdated or not.
The ubiquity of media in daily life makes this gap urgent. Researchers note that the average American now spends over 12 hours a day using media (including TV, movies, social media, news, music, even billboards). Every one of these media messages is created with intent, to persuade or influence. Without media literacy, people simply absorb these messages without questioning them. They may miss how editing, music, or camera angles shape a story, or overlook hidden assumptions about race, gender, and class. In short, without the tools to analyse media, we tend to accept or reject it superficially. Media literacy skills let us step back and ask: Who made this? What are they trying to say? What values are embedded here?
For instance, beloved 1980s teen films by director John Hughes have been criticised today for outdated attitudes. A recent review bluntly describes his popular movies as “riddled with misogyny, racism, toxic masculinity, homophobia and straight-up abuse.” We now recognise that many scenes which were meant to be funny then (relentless pursuit of a disinterested girl, crude racial nicknames, or a nerd’s girlfriend getting cornered while drunk) are deeply problematic. But in their time, these films often went unchallenged or even celebrated. The older audience that grew up with them can remember why they connected (style, music, teenage angst) even as they cringe at the flaws. Younger viewers encountering these films through social media clips have little patience for nuance: if it seems unfair or ugly now, they may dump it without discussion. The bottom line is that calling something “aged poorly” throws away opportunities to learn about the past – both about the media itself and about how we’ve changed.
Introducing “Virtue Mirroring”
Part of the reason we rush to these judgements is what we’ll call virtue mirroring. This concept means that audiences often expect media to reflect their own sense of virtue. It is related to the idea of virtue signalling – expressing moral opinions to show you’re a good person – but applied to media consumption. In other words, when we engage with a film or song, we subconsciously ask “Does this reflect the values I hold dear?” If it does, we are comfortable. If it clashes with those values, we might feel an immediate sense of distrust or disapproval.
Social critics note that publicly signalling virtue can signal trustworthiness to others. By analogy, when media seems to share our moral stance, we may trust it more easily; when it doesn’t, we quickly doubt it. Imagine two old TV shows: one that features an outspoken, outspokenly feminist heroine, and another with a male-lead who makes sexist jokes. Viewers might applaud the former without thinking much about story or craft, while writing off the latter as “problematic”, even if both were products of their time. The media that mirrors our own virtues (or the virtues society loudly professes today) is rewarded in our minds; media that doesn’t is penalised.
This virtue-mirroring lens can flatten our analysis. Instead of asking why a character behaves badly, or how a film reflects its era, we only note that it doesn’t match our current morals. For example, some old comedies treat bullying or female shaming as jokes. A media-literate viewer might recognise these as reflections of then-common attitudes (or challenge them ironically). But a viewer engaging in virtue mirroring only sees “bullying = bad” and thumbs down the show. The phrase “it didn’t age well” becomes shorthand for “this doesn’t reflect my values”, rather than a meaningful critique.
Toward Deeper Analysis
To move past these traps, we need to strengthen media literacy and invite more nuanced criticism. This means teaching people not just to identify stereotypes, but also to discuss their origins and effects. For instance, instead of simply banning or ignoring an old cartoon with a dated stereotype, a media-literate approach would note the stereotype, explain its history, and consider how culture has shifted since the cartoon was made. It would also encourage empathy: recognising that people of any era are products of their time, even as we remain critical of harmful ideas.
In practice, media literacy can be fostered by education and conversation. Schools and community groups can discuss classic films in context (as some film classes do), and online commentators can highlight both the good and bad parts of old media rather than condemning it entirely. When viewers see both sides (the entertainment value and the faults) they are less likely to retreat to slogans. They might note that a movie’s romance leads to an implied assault scene, and then analyse why that happened (script oversight, genre trope, a wink at rebellion, etc.) instead of just reacting with “ugh”. Media literacy thus turns passive viewers into active analysts.
Unlike earlier decades when most people shared the same TV shows and films, today audiences are divided among countless streaming services and social platforms.(📷:colostate.edu)
Ultimately, our discussion of old media tells us something about ourselves and our society. Blanket statements like “X didn’t age well” are easy and self-congratulatory – they affirm our own present-day virtue. But real understanding comes from critical engagement. By acknowledging our tendency toward virtue mirroring, we can correct for it. We can ask: What was this work trying to say? How might audiences have felt then, and why? By doing so, we build a richer media culture. We connect more thoughtfully with older works, and we model sophisticated analysis for others. In the long run, stronger media literacy and open-minded critique will build bridges between generations of audiences and creators, keeping conversations alive instead of closed off by a dismissive catchphrase.
Produced for @empowervmedia Edited & fact-checked by @jorgebscomm * Effective communication is a cornerstone of quality healthcare. (📷: carlow.edu ) Imagine sitting across from a doctor or nurse after days of pain or worry: the words they use and how they listen may change your entire experience of care. Communication is one of the foundations of healthcare; every patient interaction depends on it, from explaining a treatment to guiding recovery . Communication is a critical clinical competence because it establishes trust between providers and patients . When providers take time to listen and explain information clearly, patients tend to feel more at ease and errors become far less likely. Poor communication was shown to cause between 10% and 25% of patient safety incidents . In other words, talking and listening carefully isn’t just nice; it literally keeps patients safer and helps them heal. Healthcare Communication ▶️ 2m33s Building Trust Through Empathy and Clarity...
Produced by @jorgebscomm for @empowervmedia * FACT-CHECKED ✅ Digital media has reshaped not only how we access information but also how we experience time and meaning in our constantly connected world. (📷:progressive-charlestown) In the analogue era, clocks and other time-keeping devices carried a narrative rhythm; a visible arc that gave people a palpable sense of time passing. Today’s digital clocks, by contrast, lack a fluid narrative, presenting time in stark, static figures. This shift symbolically mirrors our current digital media environment, where the absence of narrative progression leads many to feel as though history or our future is abruptly ending. The sudden, disjunctive experience of digital time creates an emotional vacuum that some interpret as apocalyptic, pushing individuals toward the belief that everything is collapsing around them. Studies indicate that narrative deficits in digital interfaces contribute to user disorientation and heightened anxiety ...
Comments