EXPLAINER @jorgebscomm for @empowervmedia Photo: Lisa Fotios via Pexels · Pexels License Seeing, sharing and believing are different activities. Understanding their relationship helps explain why information can circulate widely without becoming reliable knowledge. S omeone shares a sensational headline on social media. It receives hundreds of reactions, travels through several group chats and eventually appears in a discussion about public policy. What does this tell us? We know the message circulated. We cannot conclude that everyone who shared it believed it, understood its evidence or intended to persuade others. A person may forward an article to question it, express concern, entertain friends or signal membership of a group. Communication behaviour does not have a single meaning. This is where epistemic communication becomes useful as an analytical perspective: it asks how claims move between people, what gives them...
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Far-Right Ideologies in Education: A Call for Critical Examination
In recent years, a troubling trend has emerged within higher education institutions—a noticeable increase in the prevalence of far-right ideologies among students and educators alike. Despite the traditionally progressive nature of academic environments, the infiltration of extremist ideologies poses significant challenges to principles of diversity, inclusion, and academic freedom. This article explores the potential factors contributing to this trend, its potential impact on learning environments, and strategies for fostering a more inclusive and evidence-based academic space.
Extremist ideologies pose significant challenges to principles of diversity, inclusion, and academic freedom. (📷 lumen.learning)
Curricula and campus culture are determinants of understanding and dialogue. (📷 dissolve)
The rise of extremist ideologies in higher education is a complex issue that demands urgent attention and action. By fostering critical examination, promoting inclusive dialogue, and reaffirming commitment to core values of diversity and academic freedom, universities can uphold their role as engines of progress and social change.
Critical Analysis @jorgebscomm for @empowervmedia A reputational attack can acquire force through repetition, amplification and fragmented networks of trust. 📷 @empowervmedia A smear campaign does more than communicate something negative. It attempts to reorganise how a person is interpreted, shifting attention from evidence, arguments or actions toward a damaging story about character. In digital information environments, repetition, identity, uncertainty and amplification can give that story a life far beyond its original source. C haracter assassination is defined by George Mason University’s Character Assassination and Reputation Protection lab as the deliberate destruction of an individual’s reputation or credibility through character attacks. Those attacks are public and intentional. That distinction matters: criticism, investigation and accountability can da...
Produced for @empowervmedia Edited & fact-checked by @jorgebscomm O ur enduring fascination with reality television is a sophisticated interaction between media stimuli and the human cognitive architecture. At the heart of this engagement lies Cognitive Appraisal Theory , which suggests that our emotional responses to media are governed by how we evaluate the content in relation to our personal well-being. When a viewer engages with a reality show, they undergo a primary appraisal to determine if the on-screen drama is a threat or a benefit to their emotional state, followed by a secondary appraisal where they assess their own resources for coping with those emotions. This internal evaluation process explains why some viewers find the high-stakes conflict of competition shows exhilarating while others experience it as a significant psychological stressor. Recent empirical research indicates that frequent viewers often report heightened anxiety and affective dysregulation, part...
Produced for @empowervmedia Edited & fact-checked by @jorgebscomm Prebunking misinformation before it spreads builds cognitive immunity. (📷:empowervmedia) T he current global landscape is defined by a paradox of connectivity where the tools meant to unite humanity are frequently weaponised to fragment it. According to the 2025 Global Risks Report, misinformation and disinformation have emerged as the primary short-term threats to societal stability, surpassing even economic instability and environmental crises. This "infodemic" is not merely a technical glitch but a structural failure of the digital ecosystem, which was originally designed for engagement rather than accuracy. Structural challenges persist because the information environment was built to prioritise viral content, often allowing falsehoods to travel faster than verified facts. The consequences of this erosion are quantifiable across diverse sectors of public life. In the United States, trust in national...
Comments